John Mercier

Members
  • Content count

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

John Mercier last won the day on December 19 2016

John Mercier had the most liked content!

About John Mercier

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    New Hampshire

Previous Fields

  • Favorite Riding Area
    ====
  • Club(s)
    NDVATV

Recent Profile Visitors

1,370 profile views
  1. Some good news

    I'm sure by the time hits most would have simply changed out to something else to do.
  2. Some good news

    How many of us would be around in the next century to care?
  3. Proposed changes at F&G

    The Court system only gets what could be declared as a ''large slice'' because the fines are so small. Even if the F&G received 100% of previous year's fines... they only write about 1000 tickets with most being for $78. $78k is nice, but they are looking for $1 million per year at this time. The Feds are most likely a ''no''; as that opens to the gates to other federal land issues. The M&R is most likely a ''no'' as that opens up the coffers the NH Parks... and pulls money from other ''priorities'' that the new legislators are laying out. The most they could hope for there would be general funds to cover deficits in the SAR fund annually; and even that may come with strings attached to non-consumptive users. The kayak and canoe money would need to go into the public launches that F&G keeps complaining are only being funded by a percentage of boaters... so that money wouldn't be available to fix their field officer issues... and would sit in a fund that seldom gets used do to other adverse actions by local landowners. Even at the $248 NHSA proposal, they would need to write about four times as many tickets... and incur some hearing costs... so that might be as many as five times as many tickets.
  4. What did you do with your portion of the $10 million

    It should be an interesting year. New State budget proposal will be submitted by the Governor... some of that is DOA. Then the new NH House will take up the budget, and other than some fudging on the numbers, we should see that they have a lot of new ideas for where the limited State revenues should go. I suspect that F&G and NHSA will enter the registration proposal either into the budget discussion, or slightly there after. Since the F&G continuing dream of getting portion of the Meals & Rental isn't likely to see daylight with revenues going to other areas... we may be in for more than we asked for. Normally, I would think that heavy lobbying of the Governor would be the political valve to shutdown some of the fervor, but after the ''womp''ing that he took on the last veto... that may not be in the cards as he ponders his political future. Of course we have the ''unknowns''... Will FERC find in a declaratory judgement in support of NERA? That could raise the value of motorized trail recreation, and possibly forestall some of the damage... no guarantee of course... but at least a point that could be made against an increase. Will the NHSC find in favor of the NP? Since I don't believe the project is currently financial viable, but I haven't kept up with how far ahead - or even if they are ahead - the competition is, that will most likely just be a financial exit for NP investors... that also could make motorized trail recreation a higher value. And it is anyone's guess at what will happen at the federal level, I suspect that we may do well... all 50 States gain some benefit through expansion of NRTP granting.
  5. How high could sled registration go?

    I wonder if they will just be shifting the cost structure?
  6. How high could sled registration go?

    The situation prior to the change was that most registered, but never bothered to join a club. So club member would register, pay more to join a club, and then be responsible for getting all the work done - and there is a lot more work than the work parties with all the paperwork and legal requirements.
  7. How high could sled registration go?

    There is a State committee... actually I think it may be the second one... exploring the options to fund F&G.
  8. How high could sled registration go?

    A flat line budget would still mean an increase due to the current lower number of sled registrations than was previously used. It would also mean a drop in purchasing power due to inflation. Taking those two items into consideration would mean about a 25% increase for the lower registration numbers, and then about a 28% increase for inflationary adjustments. That is how the State of NH budgets.
  9. How high could sled registration go?

    The extra $10 that goes to the Association would be available for the clubs to use under GIA. Resident to non-resident is usually provided by the F&G, age of machine would take some time in the database...
  10. How high could sled registration go?

    Most likely the answer would be no. Grants are not automatically paid out. Grants are a reimbursement. As FR pointed out, lack of snow means no grooming hours and no grant money accessed. It does roll over in the specific BoT account, but the club can have a very tough financial time because the costs exist regardless of the lack of revenue. The federal change to the RTP, at what is already a trying time, is putting another element in the mix.
  11. Actually, I was there. We didn't try to ''dump'' Marine Patrol on the F&G. Governor Lynch had made a legislative suggestion to get rid of the department and move the various responsibilities to other departments. The Department of Safety would be responsible for enforcement. DES would take much of the other functions with the biologist over. DRED would take over the land management. Since F&G handled ''off-highway'' enforcement at the time (and did not have authority over enforcement on-highway), the only other group handling ''off-highway'' enforcement was DOS-Marine Patrol. I, and others, mentioned to the Governor and legislators that if the department was not dissolved... a realignment may be smarter to move Marine Patrol to F&G. F&G has always wanted the funding from Marine Patrol - an example is canoes and kayaks that other than public landing access would have little to nothing to do with F&G; and thus requiring them to register should be money granted more to funding Marine Patrol, and not F&G. The story also suggest that ''rescues'' are only paid for through the $100,000, or so, of HikeSafe cards... when in reality the greatest funding source for the SAR fund is a $1 charge on boat, snowmobile, and OHRV registrations... even to this day. Federal funding to them is toward hunting, fishing, trapping, and wildlife conservation... so I think the Legislature is still on the same line of discussion as it was in 2008. Back then, a legislator had emtered a bill to use Rooms & Meals taxes to fund F&G that got shot down, so he wanted another $20 added to each OHRV and snowmobile registration for funding to F&G. Major Acerno came to me with an idea. Each of the registrations had 100 gallons of gasoline taxation allocated to them... the ''unreturned'' funds were being split 50/50 between the BoT and DoT. Major Acerno suggested that the F&G would oppose the $20 increase, helping us with the oversight committees, in return for NHOHVA support of changing that to 50/50 between BoT and F&G. I made the agreement for NHOHVA; since DoT provided nothing to OHRVs at the time.
  12. Balsams News - Can't be good

    Maybe you'll get your chance.
  13. What did you do with your portion of the $10 million

    I know what Dave was proposing. I did not respond to Dave, I responded to John. Dave's proposal was not seeking a legislative action... it was only a plea registrants to take an option that already exists. The loss of clubs, and loss of miles, is not always the same. i have a lot more experience in that area than most. Belknap ATV - in an area that John would know about - closed its club and merged with NDATV. The reason was not a lack of funding... the club was heavily funded with plenty of GIA/RTP access. The problem was that of the 24 months that officers served... all the officers except myself missed more than 12 monthly meetings. Without enough officers at a monthly meeting, no quorum... so no business could be conducted and no management decisions made. After the merger with NDVATV, several came forward asking if we could keep the Belknap ATV trails open... I explained that we could... but it would require someone to step forward and be a Trail Master reporting to the Trail Administrator for that happen. Several stepped forward, but almost instantly resigned. It takes quite a bit of human effort to keep even an established trail viable. NDVATV had a large trail closure. But it also had exceptional funding and access to grants. The landowner did not want to enter a lease, and did not wish to sell, so having access to funding for such did not help. The landowner being unhappy with undesired activities not related to OHRVs occurring on their land and no F&G support on the issue. So even though the ''loss'' of trails in the OHRV community is not weather-related (that is an issue that they will not have to deal with).... I stand on my assessment of trail loss, the historical number of miles of trails, and the focus that the legislative committees will have. But if you don't agree... then read past posts on trail closures. GIA doesn't stop riders from going where they shouldn't or doing what they shouldn't. The issues that are being presented are internal to the snowmobile community... their clubs and the NHSA.
  14. What did you do with your portion of the $10 million

    I think the Legislature will more likely question the fact that they just barely passed legislation to cover OHRV/OHM's under the same policy. It would not make a lot of sense to go one way, and then the other, all within a short period of time. So the Legislature is most likely going to consider this an ''internal'' issue for the community, rather than a legislative imperative. The House Committee is going to be more likely to consider F&G funding, and BoT funding, to be more of a legislative imperative when it comes to the registration policy. The ''loss'' of trails that Dave is pointing out is historically inconsistent and the causation inaccurate. Snowmobile trail miles are historically high relative to decades past. The '''loss'' of trails are most attributed to development - snowmobiles do not set aside money to purchase or lease land, undesired activity - that would equate to more F&G officers and not more GIA, and changes in the weather pattern - not something within the empowerment of the NH Legislature.
  15. VD NUMBERS IN BLOCKS from NHSA to Club?

    I think that may be some of the NHSA's intent under the proposals for the registration funding legislative changes; but what he is pointing at is past members of the Moultonboro SMC may go to the portal and end up choosing a different club. So the portal system removes the marketing advantage of having only a couple of others clubs to compete with at the local registration station. If you automated and dislocate the entire registration function, it removes even more of the marketing advantage... because you may not even bother to go to the local registration station where the maps/decals/etc are being sold; and you may be less likely to donate to a specific club or area. That means rethinking the marketing strategy for many of the more successful clubs that have used this strategy.